In this regard, it shares many of the same strengths and weaknesses as its predecessor. However, the game has been constructed using the same engine as before and features identical gameplay. With its ravaged cityscapes and polluted skies, the Capital Wasteland is essentially a dark mirror for the new Mojave Wasteland, which did not sustain a direct nuclear strike. Nevertheless, from a strictly visual standpoint, there's a jarring contrast between the two titles. Obsidian Entertainment may have taken the development reigns, but New Vegas has been built using the 'if it's not broken, don't fix it' school of thought.

Dark irradiated landscapes give way to blue skies and bright lights in this new venture, but is there much on offer besides a change of aesthetic?Īnyone expecting a radically different offering to Fallout 3 might be disappointed. If it wasn't enough for you the first time around, the formula has now been rehashed and adorned with a few bells and whistles in Fallout: New Vegas. Combining RPG elements with first-person shooter mechanics, the game broke new ground in both genres with its non-linear structure and innovative gameplay features. As one of 2008's standout titles, Fallout 3's appeal extends far beyond its mesmerising backdrop. Two years ago, Bethesda Softworks introduced us to a post-nuclear playground immersive enough to make the apocalypse seem like an eagerly-awaited event.

Fallout new vegas glitches ps3